Home
Join Us
Login
We MUST Remove this Government NOW!
Apathy Kills Democracy
We asked the following two questions:
1. Do YOU think the government needs to go, if so, WHY?
2. What would YOU like to see them replaced with?
Here are some answers we received...
(Click the "more" button to see some more.)
1.
Q1.
Liars and sleaze stopping triple lock treating ill n disabled like criminals treating covid as if it no longer exists giving poor peoples money to the rich that's just for starters
Q2.
Labour or perhaps coalition government to try to solve countries problems but not including tories
2.
Q1.
Since their election in 2019 we as a nation have been on the receiving end of consistent and continuous lies, they have forced through policies which are no advantageous to the people of Britain, They are made up of a large criminal contingent who appear to break the law on a regular basis but are never bought to justice.
Q2.
a government representative of the people a form of PR would be acceptable whereby elected members would in turn elect a leader of the country with a system in place to replace the leader in the event of corruption or law breaking.
3.
Q1.
Since their election in 2019 we as a nation have been on the receiving end of consistent and continuous lies, they have forced through policies which are no advantageous to the people of Britain, They are made up of a large criminal contingent who appear to break the law on a regular basis but are never bought to justice.
Q2.
a government representative of the people a form of PR would be acceptable whereby elected members would in turn elect a leader of the country with a system in place to replace the leader in the event of corruption or law breaking.
4.
Q1.
Since their election in 2019 we as a nation have been on the receiving end of consistent and continuous lies, they have forced through policies which are no advantageous to the people of Britain, They are made up of a large criminal contingent who appear to break the law on a regular basis but are never bought to justice.
Q2.
a government representative of the people a form of PR would be acceptable whereby elected members would in turn elect a leader of the country with a system in place to replace the leader in the event of corruption or law breaking.
5.
Q1.
Yes because they are bordering on fascism and are only serving the interests of the mega rich and the wealthy.They don't care two hoots about workers,the sick and the elderly.They have run down the NHS.Prices are going through the roof,we have a cost of living crisis,energy bills are sky high.People are dying and going hungry. We must have a fair and decent government that is accountable.Tories need to go and be replaced by a coalition government democratically elected.We need proportional representation.
Q2.
Some type of coalition government that is democratically elected by proportional representation.
6.
Q1.
They are corrupt criminals who use their power to use the legal system to cover their activities to the detriment of the majority of people living in the uk
Q2.
A government that is elected on the basis of their manifesto being a legally binding document that would see them automatically thrown out of office if the waiver from they stray from the basis of the promises they were elected on.
7.
Q1.
yes and tories should NEVER be elected again! The whole party should go. They are lying manipulative self serving scum only in it for themselves and money money money . Has been true ever since their formation
Q2.
Full PR and 2 new parties a socialist party and a liberal party to replace liebour and the fascist party. Remove the house of lords and have a small elected house to oversee the main political chamber. All candidates should be free of party membership and be professionals eg scientists , engineers ,lawyers, teachers, medics who can actually contribute some expertise as MPs have none! few are qualified in anything but lying and politics !
8.
Q1.
Yes for many reasons, eg ..profit over people; cronyism; austerity; Disconnected from the public; all the laws' they have pushed through/ are pushing through; dishonesty; privilege .
Q2.
A socialist government
9.
Q1.
They do not plan for the long term future
Q2.
An alliance of moderate views
10.
Q1.
yes . It's destroying th elives of th epeople of this country
Q2.
a centre left part of honest , committed people who have a proper knowledge ofeconomics
11.
Q1.
Yes because they are corrupt and rotten to the core.
Q2.
A progressive alliance of all,opposition parties
12.
Q1.
Current government is corrupt and incompetent
Q2.
A coalition
13.
Q1.
This government does not represent the true will of the majority, and gained power through a broken non democratic system.
Q2.
I would like to see a government of national unity that represents all viewpoints and beliefs. That has been elected through a system of proportional representation.
14.
Q1.
It's non democratic, pushes bills through parliament whilst using distraction techniques to fool the electorate. Their loyalties are elitist and the poor are becoming poorer under their their watch. Capitalism is their mantra.
Q2.
A democratic diverse government which is inclusive for all people no matter what their social standing.
15.
Q1.
It's non democratic, pushes bills through parliament whilst using distraction techniques to fool the electorate. Their loyalties are elitist and the poor are becoming poorer under their their watch. Capitalism is their mantra.
Q2.
A democratic diverse government which is inclusive for all people no matter what their social standing.
16.
Q1.
It's non democratic, pushes bills through parliament whilst using distraction techniques to fool the electorate. Their loyalties are elitist and the poor are becoming poorer under their their watch. Capitalism is their mantra.
Q2.
A democratic diverse government which is inclusive for all people no matter what their social standing.
17.
Q1.
I never voted for them in the first place and have had my life destroyed but by bit with their lies and greed
Q2.
I'd like a new coalition to be mad with Green Party and trade unions who actually represent the people and environment
18.
Q1.
Fxfcaq Equivalent Cialis Pour Femme https://newfasttadalafil.com/ - Cialis Cdmbrx
Cialis
Uldspj https://newfasttadalafil.com/ - Cialis
Q2.
Fxfcaq Equivalent Cialis Pour Femme https://newfasttadalafil.com/ - Cialis Cdmbrx
Cialis
Uldspj https://newfasttadalafil.com/ - Cialis
19.
Q1.
Yes, corruption, lies, theft, mismanagement, cronyism, Rwanda policy, I could be here all day.
Q2.
I've been racking my brains to find not only ways to make our point, but also to put forward a solution that will help as many people as possible. I know we cannot please all of the people all of the time but we need to start somewhere. The biggest issue is cost of living which will really bite this winter. Blocking roads might achieve a few pence less tax on fuel but how does that help in the longer term? Yes we could do an overall boycott but the public especially the poor will suffer as well as small businesses and again, what's our aim? There are over 100 taxes in Britain did you know that? All with varying, sometimes complex legislation. I think our demand should be for a single tax to cover everything and your tax should of course be levied on a sliding scale of income. So no fuel tax, energy tax, ( and abolish standing charges on that too) Council tax etc ONLY income tax. Is something like this feasible? Can any clever mathematicians work out a pro rata tax rate that would bring in what the government currently gets and match it or even increase it if all those billionaires paid their fair share? 20k or less 10% for example and slide up the scale as earnings increase. This would of course bring down the cost of everything else we buy. Early morning musings, please educate me if this is unworkable xx
20.
Q1.
Yes! It's corrupt,racist, cruel and damaging for majority of people. It's entrenching It's entrenching its power and sliding towards fascism.
Q2.
Proportional representation. We need a green socialist alternative but PR is a start and coalition governments probably safer, less extreme and more progressive.
Home
Join Us
Login